• Home 
• Series 
• Beyond Glycogenes 
• Remodeling of the Major Xeno-glycoantigen 

Sep. 19, 2002

Remodeling of the Major Xeno-glycoantigen（2002 Vol.06, A9）

Shuji Miyagawa / Ryota Shirakura / Naoyuki Taniguchi

• Introduction
• Strategies for Downregulating the α-Gal Epitope
• H-D Antigen
• Transgenic Pigs with Glycosyltransferases
• Prospects

1. Introduction

The increasing problem of a worldwide shortage of donor organs has led to a revival of interest in xenotransplantation. Xenograftings can be classified as either discordant or concordant, such as pig to human or monkey to human, respectively, based on the severity and pattern of the graft rejection.

The pig represents an ideal animal for discordant xenografts for a variety of reasons, including anatomical, physiological and ethical considerations. Exposure of pig cells, tissues and organs to human blood, however, results in a so-called hyperacute rejection which is mediated by naturally occurring high-titer antibodies and complements in humans. The major xenoantigen responsible for this type of rejection is a single carbohydrate structure, the α-Gal epitope (Galα1-3Galβ1-4GlcNAc-R), expressed by most mammalian cells, including swine. The α-Gal epitope was first identified as a main component of rabbit erythrocyte glycolipids and was described as an internal type 1 chain, and later corrected to be a linear type 2 chain oligosaccharide. This antigen is the major antigen involved in pig to human xenotransplantation, which is synthesized by α1,3 galactosyltransferase (α1,3GT).^1-3 Human and other Old World primates, however, are not able to synthesize this sugar structure because they have only a pseudogene due to a single nucleotide deletion at two separate positions which may serve to disrupt the translational reading frame. A reciprocal relationship exists between α-Gal epitope expression and the production of the anti-αGal antibody which is probably produced by constant antigenic stimulation by the α-Gal like epitopes which are located on the surface of normally occuring bacterial flora. Thus, humans acquire natural antibodies which account for as much as 1 % of the total circulating IgG, and which is also found in significant amounts as an IgM antibody.^4,5

Trials designed to overcome hyperacute rejection by the expression of complement regulatory proteins, such as membrane cofactor protein (MCP; CD46), decay accelerating factor (DAF; CD55) and CD59 (MACIF, HRF20) on the graft has been shown to be quite effective.⁶ As the next step, trials, designed to overcome hyperacute rejection and acute vascular rejection, which is characterized by the presence of xenoreactive antibodies and the subsequent activation of graft endothelium, the activation of small amounts of complement, and incompatibility of the coagulation system, by modification of the glycosyltransferase(s) using gene technology are currently underway.

2. Strategies for Downregulating the α-Gal Epitope

2-1.　Knock Out (K.O.) ( Fig. 1 shown by red )

This strategy involves knocking out the α1,3GT, using an embryonic stem cell or somatic cell in conjunction with nuclear transplantation techniques. Gene targeting by homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells is not presently feasible still, since swine embryonic stem cells are not available for study. However, nuclear transplantation techniques from somatic cells to swine oocytes have been established at several institutes.⁷ Piglets in which one allele of the α1,3GT locus has been knocked out were produced by nuclear transfer, using pig fibroblasts, by two different groups.^8,9

Regarding with the K.O. of this gene, α1,3GT K.O. mice have been produced. Compared to wild mice, the cells and tissues of these mice bind to a lesser extent to the xenoantibody from human serum and are less sensitive to human complement. These mice, however, develop cataracts at 4-6 weeks of age.^10,11

In terms of α1,3GT activity in organs, the mouse expresses a relatively lower α1,3GT activity than the pig in many organs. The differences are in the 10-fold range, except for the lung, based on our investigation.¹² Galili et al also concluded that α-Gal epitope expression in pig organs is up to 500-fold higher than in mouse organs. Problems continue to exist regarding α1,3GT K.O. pigs, including severe deformity or lethality.

GT2 ( Fig. 1 shown by brown )

Sandrin et al reported, at the VI Congress of the International Xenotransplantation Association, that pig has two α1,3GT, that is GT1 and GT2. They clearly encode GT2 as a different gene from GT1, and the potency of GT2 for producing the α-Gal epitopes has been clearly demonstrated by staining with the Griffonia simplicifolia 1 isolectin (GSIB4 lectin), which bind to the α-Gal epitope.¹³ Concerning the existence of this gene in the pigs, further studies will be required.

2-2.　Substrate Competition in Core Glycosylation ( Fig. 1 shown by green )

A variety of strategies, designed to downregulate the α-Gal epitope have been reported. One of these involves controlling sugar chain biosynthesis using the β-D-mannoside β-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase III (GnT-III) enzyme, which leads to a remodeling of the total antigenicity of the cell surface. Our previous studies showed a reduction in α-Gal epitope expression , in the case of pig endothelial cell transfectants. GnT-III catalyzes the branching of N-linked oligosaccharides to produce a bisecting N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) residue. The attachment of a bisecting GlcNAc inhibits the further processing of oligosaccharides by other glycosyltransferases. That is, once a bisecting GlcNAc residue is added to the core mannose by GnT-III, the action of other competitive enzymes such as α-3-D-mannoside β-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase IV (GnT-IV) and α-6-D-mannoside β-1,6-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V (GnT-V) are prevented from introducing any additional tri-antennary structures into the Golgi stack. As a result, it is likely that α-Gal epitope levels are decreased because the bisecting GlcNAc suppresses the further processing of complex-type sugar chains.
The disadvantage of this strategy is that GnT-III acts only on the N-linked sugar of a glycoprotein which is considered to have strong antigenicity. Therefore, other epitopes on O-linked sugar and glycolipids are basically unregulated by this enzyme.^14,15

2-3.　Substrate Competition in Terminal Glycosylation ( Fig. 1 shown by blue )

Another strategy for downregulating the α-Gal epitope is to take advantage of the enzymatic competition for terminal glycosylation between α1,3GT and other glycosyltransferases for the common acceptor substrate in the trans Golgi network by masking the Gal epitope by fucosylation or sialylation. Several glycosyltransferases, such as α1,2FT, α2,3 sialyltransferase (α2,3ST), as well as α2,6 sialyltransferase (α2,6ST) represent possibilities for achieving this. Among these, the gene transfection of α1,2FT has been reported to result in a drastic suppression of α-Gal.¹⁶ Sandrin, M.S. et al. reported an approximate 70 % reduction in α-Gal expression in a pig kidney fibroblast cell.¹⁷ Moreover, Sharma, A. et al demonstrated that this approach is effective in transfected CHO cells with α1,3GT and α1,2FT.¹⁸ Both reports also indicated that this approach for reducing the α-Gal is quite effective in the transgenic mouse. In addition, transgenic pigs which express α1,2FT have already been reported by several groups. However, as a disadvantage, Sepp, A. et al. demonstrated that Lewis^X expression was reduced to background levels, while the Lewis^Y neoepitope was induced in the case of α1,2FT expressing pig cells.¹⁹

On the other hand, as we have previously reported, α2,3ST and α2,6ST dramatically suppresses the antigenicity of pig cells to human natural antibodies, more completely than the α1,2FT. In addition, we demonstrated that the combined transfer of GnT-III and α2,3ST appears to account for approximately 80% of the downregulation in xenoantigenicity.²⁰

2-4.　GP3ST ( Fig. 1 shown by light blue )

A novel sulfotransferase, glycoprotein-3-sulfotransferase (GP3ST) shows sulfotransferase activities toward oligosaccharides that contains nonreducing β-galactosides. GP3ST is able to act on both type 1 (Galβ1-3GlcNAc-R) and type 2 (Galβ1-4GlcNAc-R) chains with a similar efficiency. The functional feature of GP3ST to the α-gal epitope belongs to the terminal enzyme competition group, such as α1,2FT and α2,6ST. Because the substrate specificities of GP3ST are nearly the same as α2,6ST.

In our previous study, while the feature of the downregulation of xenoantigens, such as the α-Gal epitope, by GP3ST was very similar to those by α2,6ST, the degree of reduction of xenoantigen by GP3ST transfection is slightly milder than that by α2,6ST, about the same extent as α1,2FT. GP3ST transfection is effective in downregulating the α-Gal epitope in both glycoproteins and glycolipids.^21,22

2-5.　α-galactosidase Treatment ( Fig. 1 shown by purple )

The elimination of the α-Gal epitope on the cell membrane by treatment with α-galactosidase represents a potentially effective approach, and the transgene of the cDNA is also effective. However, in spite of the drastic elimination of α-Gal in pig cells with the α-galactosidase gene, the transgenic mouse carring the α-galactosidase alone showed only a 15-25 % reduction in α-Gal content. Another study suggests that a combined transgenic approach using α-galactosidase and α1,2FT results in the continuous suppression of α-Gal in donor tissue.²³

2-6.　Endo-β-galactosidase C (Endo Gal C) ( Fig. 1 shown by pink )

This enzyme was identified and purified from Clostridium perfringens culture media, has a strong activity for digesting α-Gal epitopes by cleaving the β-galactosidic linkage in the Galβ1-3Galβ1-4GlcNAc structure as evidenced, by an vitro assay and ex vivo perfusion as well. In addition, it is possible to inject Endo-Gal C into pigs and monkeys intravenously without serious side effects. This drug would be useful in eliminating the α-Gal epitope of the donor tissue as a temporary method. However, the production of a transgenic animal with this gene is not feasible at this moment.²⁴

2-7.　Others

A combined approach with glycosyltransferases, such as α2,3ST and GnT-III, or α-galactosidase and α1,2FT, has already demonstrated the effective suppression of α-Gal. Therefore, a triple combination of GnT-III, fucosyltransferase or sialyltransferase, and α-galactosidase, might be the best approach to achieve the downregulation of xenoantigenisity at the present time. Needless to say, to achieve the best approach for overcoming hyperacute rejection, two or three complement regulatory proteins must be simultaneously added to the combined glycosyltransferases.^{20, 25}

3. H-D Antigen ( Fig. 1 shown by yellow )

The Hanganutziu-Deicher (H-D) antigen, which contains N-glycolylneuraminic acid (NeuGc) is widely distributed in mammalian species, except for humans. The expression of NeuGc is controlled by cytidine monophospho-N-acetylneuraminic acid (CMP-NeuAc) hydroxylase activity. The absence of NeuGc in human glycoconjugates is due to a partial deletion in the gene that encodes CMP-NeuAc hydroxylase.^26,27 Therefore, this epitope has the potential to become one of the largest epitopes in the pig to human xenotransplantaion after α1,3GT is knocked out.

Several strategies for reducing this antigen in pig cells are under consideration and include the K.O. of CMP-NeuAc hydroxylase gene.²⁸ Fortunately, it is also possible for GnT-III to reduce the levels of the H-D antigen, because GnT-III does not act exclusively on an α-Gal.

On the other hand, Kobayashi et al. reported that no difference in the mean values of IgG and IgM antibody levels against NeuGc-GM3 was observed between healthy volunteers and patients with pig kidney perfusion 1 to 3 weeks previously or pig islet cell transplantation 2 months previously.²⁹

4. Transgenic Pigs with Glycosyltransferases

Regarding transgenic pig that produced a glycosyltransferase, four groups have reported on a transgenic pig able to produce human α1,2FT. The first report was by Nagoya’s group. They actually produced transgenic pigs with α1,2FT, but could not maintain the transgenic line long enough for a clear analysis. The next report by Nextran, analyzed only a tail section of the transgenic pig. Another case was reported by Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. They used a H2K^b and a CMV promoter and obtained a good level of expression of the α1,2FT gene in most of the transgenic pig tissues, and analyzed modified cell surface carbohydrates, mainly fibroblasts. A 50 % reduction in the α-Gal epitopes of the PEC from the α1,2FT transgenic pigs was also shown, but they did not perform a transplantational experiment.³⁰ The other report by Cowan, P.J. et al. described the combined transgenic pigs with CD55 (DAF)/ α1,2FT and CD55/CD59/ α1,2FT. However, α1,2FT expressions were relatively weak and did not significantly reduce the α-Gal epitopes, suggesting the importance of a combination of the complement regulatory proteins and the glycosyltransferases. ³¹

Concerning other glycosyltransferase, the transgenic pig carrying a high level of α2,3ST activity or α2,6ST is difficult to produce, judging from our previous experience.

On the other hand, GnT-III is expressed relatively easily in transgenic pigs. The expression of GnT-III in transgenic pigs clearly modifies the surface glycoantigen in most tissues and cells, in particular α-Gal, and confers resistance to human natural immunity. This approach leads to a remodeling of the total antigenicity, that is, not only the α-Gal but also H-D antigen and other unknown epitopes as well.(fig. 2) ¹²

5. 展望

The immunological barriers in the xenotransplantation field are becoming more well defined and promising strategies for addressing these are currently under development. At the present time, none of these approaches except for the knockout completely eliminates the expression of α-Gal. Pig endothelial cells express approximately 20 x 10⁶ α-Gal epitopes. Therefore, Galili suggests that even a decrease in the α-Gal expression of 95 % may not suffice for preventing the rejection of a xenograft. Additionally, 10-30 % of the xeno-antigenicity to the human may remain on a swine cell membrane after the targeting knock out the α1,3GT.³

Further attempts to eliminate xenoantigenicity might be required in order to achieve successful clinical xenotransplantation.

---

References

1. Eto T, Ichikawa Y, Nishimura K, Ando S, Yamakawa T: Chemistry of lipid of the posthemyolytic residue or stroma of erythrocytes. XVI. Occurrence of ceramide pentasaccharide in the membrane of erythrocytes and reticulocytes of rabbit. J. Biochem. (Tokyo), 64, 205-213, 1968
2. Stellner K, Saito H, Hakomori, S: Determination of aminosugar linkages in glycolipids by methylation. Aminosugar linkages of ceramide pentasaccharides of rabbit erythrocytes and of Forssman antigen. Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 155, 464-472, 1973
3. Galili U: The alpha-gal epitope (Gal alpha 1-3Gal beta 1-4GlcNAc-R) in xenotransplantation. Biochimie, 83, 557-563, 2001
4. Galili U, Rachmilewitz EA, Peleg A, Flechner I: A unique natural human IgG antibody with anti-alpha-galactosyl specificity. J. Exp. Med., 160,1519-1531, 1984
5. Miyagawa S, Shirakura R, Iwata K, Nakata, S, Matsumiya G, Izutani H, Matsuda H, Terado A, Matsumoto M, Nagasawa S, Seya T: Effects of transfected complement regulatory proteins, MCP, DAF, and MCP/DAE hybrid, on complement-mediated swine endothelial cell lysis. Transplantation, 58, 834-840, 1994
6. Rosengard AM, Cary NRB, Langford GA, Tucker AW, Wallwork J, White DJG: Tissue expression of human complement inhibitor, decay-accelerating factor, in transgenic pigs. A potential approach for preventing xenograft rejection. Transplantation, 59, 1325-1333, 1995
7. Onishi A, Iwamoto M, Akita T, Mikawa S, Takeda K, Awata T, Hanada H, Perry ACF: Pig cloning by microinjection of fetal fibroblast nuclei. Science, 289, 1188-1190, 2000
8. Dai Y, Vaught TD, Boone J, Chen SH, Phelps CJ, Ball S, Monahan JA, Jobst PM, McCreath KJ, Lamborn AE, Cowell-Lucero JL, Wells KD, Colman A, Polejaeva IA, Ayares DL: Targeted disruption of the alpha1,3-galactosyltransferase gene in cloned pigs. Nature Biotechnol., 20, 251-255, 2002
9. Lai L, Kolber-Simonds D, Park KW, Cheong HT, Greenstein JL, Im GS, Samuel M, Bonk A, Rieke A, Day BN, Murphy CN, Carter DB, Hawley RJ, Prather RS: Production of alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout pigs by nuclear transfer cloning. Science, 295, 1089-1192, 2002
10. Thall AD, Maly P, Lowe JB: Oocyte Gal alpha 1,3Gal epitopes implicated in sperm adhesion to the zona pellucida glycoprotein ZP3 are not required for fertilization in the mouse. J. Biol. Chem., 270, 21437-21440, 1995
11. Tearle RG, Tange MJ, Zannettino ZL, Katerelos M, Shinkel TA, Van Denderen BJW, Lonie AJ, Lyons I, Nottle MB, Cox T, Becker C, Peura AM, Wigley PL, Crawford RJ, Robins AJ, Pearse MJ, dﾕApice AJF: The alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout mouse. Implications for xenotransplantation. Transplantation, 61, 13-19, 1996
12. Miyagawa S, Murakami H, Takahagi Y, Nakai R, Yamada M, Murase A, Koyota S, Koma M, Matsunami K, Fukuta D, Fujimura T, Shigehisa T, Okabe M., Nagashima H, Shirakura R, Taniguchi N: Remodeling of the major pig xenoantigen by N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase III in transgenic pig. J. Biol. Chem., 276, 39310-39319, 2001
13. Sandrin MS, Milland JA, Taylor S, Lazarus B, Dodson H, Xing P-X, McKenzie FC: A second galactosyltransferase which synthesises the major xenoepitope Gal alpha (1,3)Gal. Xenotransplantation, 8, 27, 2001
14. Tanemura M, Miyagawa S, Ihara Y, Matsuda H, Shirakura R, Taniguchi N: Significant downregulation of the major swine xenoantigen by N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase III gene transfection. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 235, 359-364, 1997
15. Taniguchi N, Yoshimura M, Miyoshi E, Ihara Y, Nishikawa A, Fujii S: Remodeling of cell surface glycoproteins by N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase III gene transfection: modulation of metastatic potentials and down regulation of hepatitis B virus replication. Glycobiology, 6, 691-694, 1996
16. Koma M, Miyagawa S, Honke K, Ikeda Y, Koyota S, Miyoshi S, Matsuda H, Tsuji S, Shirakura R, Taniguchi N: Reduction of the major xenoantigen on glycosphingolipids of swine endothelial cells by various glycosyltransferases. Glycobiology, 10, 745-751, 2000
17. Sandrin MS, Fodor WL, Mouhtouris E, Osman N, Cohney S, Rollins SA, Guilmette ER, Setter E, Squinto SP, McKenzie IF: Enzymatic remodelling of the carbohydrate surface of a xenogenic cell substantially reduces human antibody binding and complement-mediated cytolysis. Nature Med., 1, 1261-1267, 1995
18. Sharma A, Okabe J, Birch P, McClellan SB, Martin MJ, Platt JL, Logan JS: Reduction in the level of Gal(alpha1,3)Gal in transgenic mice and pigs by the expression of an alpha(1,2)fucosyltransferase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA. 93, 7190-7195, 1996
19. Sepp A, Skacel P, Lindstedt R, Lechler RI: Expression of alpha-1,3-galactose and other type 2 oligosaccharide structures in a porcine endothelial cell line transfected with human alpha-1,2-fucosyltransferase cDNA. J. Biol. Chem., 272, 23104-23110, 1997
20. Miyagawa S, Tanemura M, Koyota S, Koma M, Ikeda Y, Shirakura R, Taniguchi N: Masking and reduction of the Galactose-alpha1,3-Galactose (alpha-Gal) epitope, the major xenoantigen in swine, by the glycosyltransferase gene transfection. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 264, 611-614, 1999
21. Koma M, Miyagawa S, Honke K, Nakai R, Miyoshi S, Ohta M, Matsuda H, Shirakura R, Taniguchi, N: The Possibility of Reducing Xenoantigen Levels with a Novel Gal 3'-Sulfotransferase (GP3ST). J. Biochem. (Tokyo), 131, 517-522, 2002
22. Honke K, Tsuda M, Koyota S, Wada Y, Iida-Tanaka N, Ishizuka I, Nakayama J, Taniguchi N: Molecular cloning and characterization of a human beta-Gal-3'-sulfotransferase that acts on both type 1 and type 2 (Gal beta 1-3/1-4GlcNAc-R) oligosaccharides. J. Biol. Chem., 276, 267-274, 2001
23. Osman N, McKenzie IFC, Ostenried K, Ioannou YA, Desnick RJ, Sandrin MS: Combined transgenic expression of alpha-galactosidase and alpha1,2-fucosyltransferase leads to optimal reduction in the major xenoepitope Galalpha(1,3)Gal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 14677-14682, 1997
24. Ogawa H, Muramatsu H, Kobayashi T, Morozumi K, Yokoyama I, Kurosawa N, Nakao A, Muramatsu T: Molecular cloning of endo-beta -galactosidase C and its application in removing alpha -galactosyl xenoantigen from blood vessels in the pig kidney. J. Biol. Chem., 275, 19368-19374, 2000
25. Tanemura M, Miyagaywa S, Koyota S, Koma M, Matsuda H, Tsuji S, Shirakura R, Taniguchi N: Reduction of the major swine xenoantigen, the alpha-galactosyl epitope by transfection of the alpha2,3-sialyltransferase gene. J. Biol. Chem., 273, 16421-16425, 1998
26. Chou HH, Takematsu yH, Diaz S, Iber J, Nickerson E, Wright KL, Muchmore EA, Nelson DL, Warren ST, Varki A: A mutation in human CMP-sialic acid hydroxylase occurred after the Homo-Pan divergence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA. 95, 11751-11756, 1998
27. Irie A, Koyama S, Kozutsumi Y, Kawasaki T, Suzuki A: The molecular basis for the absence of N-glycolylneuraminic acid in humans. J. Biol. Chem., 273, 15866-15871, 1998
28. Koike C, Fung JJ, Starzl, Trucco M: Isolation and characterization of CMP-NeuAc hydroxylase gene for expression of Hanganutziu-Deicher antigen. Xenotransplantation, 8, 12, 2001
29. Kobayashi T, Yokoyama I, Suzuki A, Abe M, Hayashi S, Matsuda H, Morozumi K, Breimer, ME, Rydberg L, Groth CG, Tibell A, Korsgren O, Takagi H, Nakao A: Lack of antibody production against Hanganutziu-Deicher (H-D) antigens with N-glycolylneuraminic acid in patients with porcine exposure history. Xenotransplantation, 3,177-180, 2000
30. Costa C, Zhao L, Burton WV, Bondioli KR, Williams BL, Hoagland TA, Ditullio PA, Ebert KM, Fodor WL: Expression of the human alpha1,2-fucosyltransferase in transgenic pigs modifies the cell surface carbohydrate phenotype and confers resistance to human serum-mediated cytolysis. FASEB J., 13, 1762-1773, 1999
31. Cowan PJ, Aminian A, Barlow H, Brown AA, Chen CG, Fisicaro N, Francis DMA, Goodman DJ, Han W, Kurek M, Nottle MB, Pearse MJ, Salvaris E, Shinkel TA, Stainsby GV, Stewart AB, dﾕApice AJF: Renal xenografts from triple-transgenic pigs are not hyperacutely rejected but cause coagulopathy in non-immunosuppressed baboons. Transplantation, 69, 2504-2515, 2000

Series

Archive

Glycotext

• About Glycotext

Glycoinformation

• News
• GlycoTOKYO Young Investigator Award
• Conference Reports
• Scientist's interview
• Introduction to the Glycoscience
• Links

Glycoword

About us